|
Home Objectives Schedule Lectures Topics Cases Quizzes PDA Refs |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
Post-Stroke
Rehabilitation
Joseph
Vick Roy MD
Epidemiology
of Stroke (US Data) Incidence:
700,000 strokes per year
Incidence
doubles for every decade after 55 years of age.
Recurrence
rate = 7-10% per year Mortality:
155,000 deaths per year 3rd
leading cause of death Prevalence:
3 million survivors living Disability:
#1 cause adult disability Cost
of Stroke
(US Data) Annual
Cost: 30 - 40 billion dollars 57%
direct medical costs 43%
indirect costs, (lost productivity) Annual
Cost to Medicare: 6 billion dollars Average
Cost per Patient in the first 90 days after a stroke: $15,000
>$35,000
in about 10% Disability
After Stroke (Frenchay
Study,
UK,
1981‑83) Very
severely dependent
Acute 38%
6 months 4% Severely
dependent
Acute 20%
6 months 5% Moderately
dependent
Acute 15%
6 months 12% Mildly
dependent
Acute 12%
6 months 32% Physically
independent
Acute12%
6 months 47% Independent
walking
Acute 27%
6 months 85%
Treatment
of Stroke: Acute care vs. Rehabilitation Acute
Care Establish
diagnosis Emergency
management Identify
& treat comorbidities Identify
& reduce risk factors Prevent
& treat acute medical complications, “stabilize the patient” Acute
Stroke Care is a “Hot Topic” today due to TPA and multiple acute
interventions which are likely to become available soon. Clot‑busters
and drugs to limit thrombosis Strategies
to augment cerebral blood flow Neuroprotective
agents to protect ischemic neurons Rehabilitation Rehabilitation
is a restorative and learning process which seeks to hasten and maximize
recovery from stroke. Rehabilitation
attempts to reduce levels of disability and facilitate return to active and
productive lives through a combination of educational, counseling, physical
and technology-based interventions. Research
on Rehabilitation after Stroke Not
as “hot” - but equally important 3
million survivors - majority have disability Clinical
research offers opportunity for advances that may profoundly improve the
quality of life for survivors. (eg, constraint‑induced therapy) Basic
research offers opportunity for breakthroughs in our understanding of higher
brain functions and injury recovery mechanisms. Recent
neuroscientific studies have identified considerable evidence of cerebral
plasticity following injury. Stroke
provides an excellent model for studies regarding focal brain injury. A
Conceptual Framework of Health and Disablement,
(Nagi, 1965) Pathology
(disease): the interruption or
interference of normal bodily processes or structures. Impairment:
the loss or abnormality of mental, emotional, physiological or
anatomical structure or function. Functional
limitation:
a restriction or lack of ability to perform an action or activity in
the manner or within the range considered normal. Disability:
the inability or limitation in performing socially defined activities
and roles expected of individuals within a social or physical environment. Rehabilitation
Treatment Approach In
the rehabilitation care phase of patients with stroke, evaluation and
treatment takes place on each of
Nagi’s 4 levels. The
primary task is to recognize and reduce functional limitations so as to
minimize disability and allow the
stroke survivor to regain the highest level of independence and
quality of life possible. Most
health care provided by physicians today is focused at the disease level. Issues
related to functional impairment and disability are often overlooked during
acute treatment.
Yet, it is these areas that define the experience of a stroke to the
patient and create major barriers preventing a return to his or her
pre‑morbid “normal life”. Rehabilitation
is both a philosophy and a set of tasks. A
rehab program is comparable to a school in which the patient is provided an
opportunity for education, support, protected practice, reassurance,
direct assistance and feedback. The
patient and family must be involved in setting goals and in planning and
implementing treatments. Rehab
involves the systematic withdrawal of assistance and return of control to the patient. Rehabilitation
is done with the patient rather
than to the patient. Rehabilitation:
A Key Part of Stroke Care One
result of DRG’s and managed care has been shorter acute hospital lengths of
stay for patients with stroke. This
has resulted in a trend toward sicker (less stable), patients being admitted
to rehab programs. Much
of the work‑up and treatment for comorbidities
and stroke risk factors takes place
in the rehab hospital setting. The
Interdisciplinary Care Team Rehab
Physician Other
Medical Specialist Rehabilitation
Nurse Physical
Therapist Occupational
Therapist Speech
Therapist Case
Manager Social
Worker Neuropsychologist Recreation
Therapist Respiratory
Therapist Dietitian Vocation
Counselor Orthotist
or Rehab Engineer Initial
Assessment of Patients
Following Stroke Medical
History which includes: Acute
treatments provided Extent
and time-course of deficits Results
of imaging studies and work-up already done Comorbidities Stroke
risk factors Medical
complications encountered since the stroke Pre-morbid
functional status Family
support and living arrangement Potential
barriers to improvement Medical
Complications of Stroke DVT
and pulmonary emboli Pneumonia Hypertension
or postural hypotension Skin
decubiti Urinary
retention or incontinence Malnutrition Constipation
or bowel obstruction Spasticity Joint
contractures Shoulder
pain Seizures Dysphagia Osteoporosis Sleep
disturbances Sexual
dysfunction Extremity
edema Hydrocephalus Depression Renal
calculi Cardiac
arrythmias Heterotopic
ossification Initial
Assessment of Patients
Following Stroke Examination
includes: General
physical exam: cardiac, extremities, skin, etc. Neurologic
exam: motor, sensory, coordination, vision, etc. Mental
status exam: alertness, orientation, attention, language function, perceptual
deficits, memory, problem solving, etc. Functional
exam: (look for Functional limitations) gait and mobility, self‑care,
elimination, communication, social cognition, swallowing Impairments
After Stroke (2 weeks post‑onset) Hemiparesis
70 - 85% Ambulation
70 - 80% Visuoperception
60 - 75% ADL
dependent
40 - 65% ADL
assisted
20 - 60% Dysarthria
55% Sitting
Balance
45% Urine
incontinence
45% Depression
40% Proprioception
40% Bowel
incontinence
30% Hemianopia
20% Aphasia
20 - 35% Dysphagia
15 - 35% Hemineglect
10 - 35% Memory
loss
10 - 20% Estimation
of Rehabilitation Potential Medical
stability and concurrent medical problems Can
the patient tolerate the level of physical activity required? Nature
and extent of functional limitations severity
of stroke, (radiologic findings ) L-hemiparetic
> R-hemi > L-hemi with
hemispatial neglect Patients
with moderate disability benefit most Mental
Status, including ability to communicate and learn Pre‑stroke
functional status Emotional
status and motivation to participate in rehab Family
support / living situation Age Recovery
Mechanisms, The Scientific Basis for Rehab Many
animal and human studies have demonstrated adaptive plasticity in the brain Neuronal
Plasticity, examples include: Axonal
and dendritic regeneration Altered
efficacy of synaptic activity Activity-dependent
changes in synaptic strength Unmasking
of previously ineffective synapses Synaptogenesis Increased
neuronal responsiveness from denervation hypersensitivity Recovery
Mechanisms, The Scientific Basis for Rehab Network
Plasticity, examples include: Recovery
of neuronal excitability Resolution
of edema or diaschisis Mutability
of neuronal assemblies Expansion
of representational maps Recruitment
of cells not ordinarily involved in an activity Recruitment
of parallel and subcomponent pathways Altered
activity of the distributed functions of cortical and subcortical neural
networks Activation
of pattern generator circuits Plasticity
has been demonstrated, in sensory and motor cortex Animal
studies Direct
cortex electrical stimulation mapping Human
studies Positron
emission tomography (PET) Functional
magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) Transcranial
magnetic stimulation (TMS) Other
recovery mechanisms in rehabilitation Compensatory
strategies Adaptive
equipment Does
Rehabilitation Work? The Bad News Scientific
data supporting the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs and
interventions in improving patient outcomes is limited. Most
clinical studies have focused on short-term changes in impairment or
function during inpatient rehabilitation. Results
have been inconsistent, and where they favor the experimental group, the
difference is generally small. Distinguishing
rehabilitation effects from spontaneous neurological recovery after a stroke
is difficult. Does
Rehabilitation Work? The Good News A
growing scientific basis for rehabilitation now exists. The
value of early mobilization has been amply demonstrated. Multiple
studies have shown that better clinical outcomes are achieved when moderately
impaired stroke patients are treated in a more intensive and specialized
rehab unit as compared to a general medical ward. Ottenbacher
and Jannell published a meta-analysis in 1993 of 36 clinical studies of
stroke rehab involving 3717 patients with acute and chronic stroke.
The average patient who received a program of focused stroke
rehabilitation performed better than about 65% of the patients in the
comparison group. Neither
research evidence or expert consensus adequately supports recommendations
concerning the superiority of one type of exercise regimen over another. Is
there a Critical Period for Recovery Following a Stroke? Neurologic
and functional recovery occurs most rapidly in the first 1 to 3 months after
a stroke. It
used to be said that significant motor and sensory recovery rarely occurs
beyond 6 months. More
recent studies have shown that neural and functional recovery can continue
beyond 6 months, perhaps for several years especially with respect to
language and visuospatial functions. Constraint-Induced
Movement Therapy A
recent study of constraint-induced movement therapy (12 day treatment),
in 10 chronic hemiparetic stroke patients (5 years post-stroke average)
showed motor improvement in all subjects. 6
of the subjects showed 50 - 75% improvement in motor activity - ADL log scores (MAL). Transcranial
magnetic stimulation brain mapping showed a 40% increase in the cerebral
forearm-hand area contralateral to the paralysis.
|
|||
|
Home Objectives Schedule Lectures Topics Cases Quizzes PDA Refs |
|||
|
Last updated: 10/05/2002 © 2000-2002 John Rose, MD University of Utah School of Medicine |
|||